Everywhere we turn, we hear people asking “how long can it go on?” Whether it is financial crisis in the West, environmental pollution in the East, or increasing prices and natural disasters everywhere, there’s a growing sense of dystopia, and of the need for more fundamental reform of our economic and political systems. Mass protests can remove leaders, but what creates a lasting positive shift in society? And what are YOU doing about it? Rather than ask “how long can it go on”, it’s time to ask “how can we move on with essential changes?”

As I read leading commentators on business responsibility and sustainability sharing their insights on trends for 2012, I saw a new boldness. People are recognising the need for ambitious goals that address root causes, including economic governance failures. At Lifeworth we have been seeking to contribute to a sustainable economic transformation and published a variety of works on that theme over the past ten years. In that time I’ve seen the more critical analyses initially ignored by leaders in favour of less challenging narratives. Yet this year I think we will see more opportunity for ‘radical’ suggestions for change to be discussed and trialled. In that sense, despite the fears, it’s the year we have been waiting for. But rather than adding to the many predictions, I’ll summarise Lifeworth’s efforts that could be of relevance if you seek to team up to strive for far greater positive change than you might have before.

The first area for transformative action in which we are engaged is policy innovations for scaling responsible enterprise and finance. Rightly or wrongly, government budgets cuts are happening in many countries. The implications for them to regulate businesses for social and environmental objectives are beginning to be felt. How then can we promote and reward better business practice, without increasing the costs to government? Leveraging private standards of social or environmental performance is one option. In work for the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), we looked at public policy innovations to scale the number of firms adhering to voluntary standards like the Forest Stewardship Council. This appeared in the World Investment Report, with the full academic study published elsewhere. The idea that these forms of ‘collaborative economic governance’ are a pragmatic response to the twin challenges of sustainable development and government efficiencies, was fed into the policy discussions leading to Rio+20, happening this June. The need now is to create systems for collecting innovative public policies for scaling responsible business, analysing which work well in what contents, and disseminating this to government officials worldwide. If you can help on this project, do get in touch.

Yet we must go further than coping mechanisms in a world of irresponsible enterprise and governance failures. The second area for transformative action, therefore, is redesigning financial systems for more fair and sustainable outcomes. Although commitments to responsible investment have existed for some years, the translation into investment practice and the realities of corporate leaders has far to go. The limitations of current environmental, social and governance (ESG) practice in empowering investors to act is one of the stumbling blocks which we analysed in 2011, sparking lively debate. Our interest in ESG is because of the potential for progressive investor influence, which is a historically novel situation. In 2012 I hope we see the emergence of a progressive voice from investors on matters of public concern. Aside from investor-business relations, the public voice of the progressive investor has been slow to emerge. The Carbon Disclosure Project has shown that on climate change investors can sound a new tune on public policy. In 2012 and beyond, we could see other forums, particularly the UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI), providing opportunities for progressive investors to promote policy debates that better include social and environmental priorities. Whether they will be able to counter-balance the more regressive investor resistance to financial re-regulation will be interesting to watch.

In 2012 I’ll continue to participate in fora that discuss the need for transformation of economic systems for sustainable development, including The Finance Innovation Lab in the UK, the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, and the Griffith University conference on transition, in Australia. As I explained in an interview for Griffith, the key stumbling block to progress on tough issues is our limiting assumptions and oversights about the real causes of our crises. During the next months I’ll be asking world leaders what they think are the key activities to drive massive positive change that weren’t possible before now, and who they need to work with to make that happen. Identifying such pressure points for massive positive change will inform our philanthropy advisory during 2012, and beyond.

One area where I think there is currently a woefully lack of attention, funding and action is in “sustainable currencies”. Current monetary systems are incompatible with the goal of a fair and sustainable economy, and thus we need greater efforts at reform, as well as at developing secure, scalable and community-owned alternative currencies and barter systems. It is, no doubt, a difficult area for many to grasp; as I experienced myself. Yet in 2011 there were strides towards greater understanding by sustainable development professionals, through the work of New Economics foundation (nef), among others. My TEDx talk on the topic reached over 12,000 views in a couple of months. As austerity bites and unemployment persists, new ways of getting people working for each other without putting governments further into debt will inevitably rise up political agendas. In 2012 we will help through collaboration with Community Forge and The Finance Innovation Lab, amongst others, and promote the uptake of ’sustainable currencies’ as an innovative social development mechanism, through fora such as the Geneva Forum on Social Change.

What does this renewed emphasis on systemic change mean for specific industry sectors? I think the main implication is to be more ambitious in attempting to mainstream change for sustainable development. That is a third area for seeking transformative action. That has been our approach in the work we do in the luxury and mining sectors. With the organisation Fair Jewelry Action we researched and published “Uplifting the Earth: the ethical performance of high jewellery brands.” In this report we mapped out a transformative agenda for responsible jewellery, where the industry can contribute to sustainable development. From this basis, we aided De Beers’ stakeholder consultations, and worked with the UN Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) on their training for the jewellery industry, which will be rolled out from Antwerp this year. The Spanish version of the report was launched at the world’s first Sustainable Luxury Awards, in Buenos Aires, co-organised with CSSL and the Authentic Luxury Network. The aim of these awards is to encourage sustainable innovation in the luxury sector; this year’s awards are scheduled for November. The insights from our work on transformative corporate responsibility in the luxury sector were refined for the launch of the world’s first MBA module on ‘Sustainable Luxury and Design’, which I teach at IE Business School, in Madrid. Students learn how sustainability is the smartest and most elegant paradigm within which to design anything. At the other end of the value chain, in 2012 we are working with Channel Research and the German development agency Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) to encourage disclosure on the social, environmental and economic impacts and contributions of mining companies in the Congo. There are few more challenging locations for mining to align better with the goals of peace, human rights and development.

A fourth area for transformative action in 2012 is enhancing the way UN agencies and civil society organisations engage companies. There are now many cross-sectoral partnerships, and the relationships they established hold the potential for greater changes. Largescale change goals need to be connected back to practical steps that can deliver benefits in the near term for various partner organisations. That’s the thinking behind a spate of new resources on more transformative partnering that were released in 2011, including reports from the UN Global Compact, and my own book, “Evolving Partnerships: engaging business for greater social change.” During 2011 we applied our approach to developing transformative alliances in our support for the International Labour Organisation’s fight against forced labour. In 2012 we aim to help the development of their Global Business Alliance against Forced Labour.

Despite the shocking persistence of slavery today, and the general dystopian tone we hear from thoughtful people in international fora, or indeed, because of such darkness, we need a bright vision for life on Earth. That is why we are helping the Future Perfect Festival in Sweden in August. It will celebrate the brilliance and fun of sustainable lifestyles, sustainable businesses and sustainable communities. It will shine rays of light on a better way of life, beyond the dark mountains of outmoded and destructive ways of thinking, working and living. Our ability to understand values, and articulate them in professional contexts, is important when working towards a positive vision. My colleague Ian Doyle has therefore been teaching ‘voicing your values’ class at Grenoble Graduate School of Business, and we will be integrating this into various lines of work in 2012. In our forthcoming book, Healing Capitalism, Ian and I will seek to integrate both the personal and systemic levels of analysis, to aid transformative action.

In summary, we hope our 2012 will involve the following arenas of transformative action:
1) Policy innovations for scaling responsible enterprise and finance;
2) Redesigning financial and monetary systems for more fair and sustainable outcomes;
3) Mainstreaming contributions to sustainable development within specific industry sectors (including luxury, mining etc);
4) More ambitious collaborations between UN agencies, civil society organisations and companies;
5) Visions of sustainable ways of living, pathways to achieve them, and values competence to walk that path.

To better develop our work, this year we become a Swiss non-profit association. We will remain a network of independent associates, and will continue to deliver in partnership with other service providers, for a limited number of clients who seek to create meaningful change. If you can help us have an impact in these areas, I’d love to hear from you.

Professor Jem Bendell
Founder and Director, Lifeworth.com and Lifeworth Consulting
Adjunct Professor, Asia Pacific Centre for Sustainable Enterprise, Griffith Business School
Distinguished Visiting Professor, IE Business School

Follow me on twitter?

The current debate about economic growth is based on false assumptions about the monetary system, so both management consultants and business schools must do better to help business leaders explore how to re-design capitalism, according to Lifeworth’s founder, Professor Jem Bendell, in a recent video interview.

Professor Bendell explains that the damaging effects of the financial crisis on companies are making some business leaders ask deeper questions about our economic system. Increasing inequality also presents risks to business, according to the International Monetary Fund and World Economic Forum. Meanwhile, as the costs of natural resources rise and our population reaches 7 billion, so more business leaders are wondering whether the world can support more and more economic growth. Professor Bendell, explains that management consultants and business schools have largely failed to provide business leaders with insight on these questions, and help them develop appropriate strategies. Throughout 2011 more business thinkers shared initial ideas on creating a new form of capitalism, but were too narrow in their analysis, according to Bendell.

He says we need to uncover our hidden assumptions in order to develop new insights into the strategic implications of our current crises. He describes how the current debate about the merits of economic growth is illustrative of how the wrong assumptions lead to meaningless and unresolvable debates. Professor Bendell explains that there are now four main views about the role of economic growth in society – pro-growth, no-growth, green-growth, and beyond-growth. These positions seem irreconcilable, and yet they are all based on a false assumption that the nature of money, and its mode of creation, is neutral in its effect on society. He explains how better understanding the monetary system could help resolve the impasse on growth, and lead to new approaches from business, even including new business opportunities.

The interview echoes arguments in his 2009 book “The Corporate Responsibility Movement”, where he suggests the fundamental reform of capitalism is now an issue for responsible business leadership. The interview follows up Professor Bendell’s TEDx talk on the hidden cause of the financial crisis, which is rapidly becoming the most watched speech on monetary reform available online. During 2012 Professor Bendell will be helping Griffith Business School develop its research and events to explore redesigning capitalism for sustainable development.

Interview at Griffith University, December 2011

Click here to view the embedded video.

Speech at TEDxTransmedia, September 2011

Click here to view the embedded video.

The world’s first sustainable luxury award winners were announced in Buenos Aires earlier this month. The awards recognise outstanding leadership towards sustainable luxury, and are open to any company with a business connection to Latin America. All the winners were small enterprises, which indicates how entrepreneurs, and their young companies, are embracing sustainability to move ahead in the luxury sector. “The history of luxury is a history of entrepreneurs innovating new products, services and approaches that resonated with the aspirations of their time. Therefore, as social and environmental awareness grows worldwide, the luxury brands being created today may be the major global names of tomorrow,” explained Professor Jem Bendell, founder of the Authentic Luxury Network, a co-organiser of the awards.

The winner of the Best Sustainable Luxury Performance in Latin America in the fashion and accessories category was Pachacuti. The British-based company works with indigenous communities in Ecuador to produce fairly traded high-end panama hats. The Paris-based Ainy won the award for beauty company. It works with Latin American producers to sustainably harvest key ingredients. Argentine company Perma Hue won the award in the tourism sector. An eco-resort in Patagonia, Perma Hue seeks to promote the wellbeing of their visitors through re-connecting with nature. In the jewellery sector, a special mention was given to Oro Verde, not as a company, but as a community cooperative, pioneering the production of ethical gold. They work with Afro-Colombian communities to support small-scale alluvial mining operations in the Choco region of Colombia. Oro Verde™ have pioneered an environmentally sustainable, socially responsible form of artisanal mining that seeks to preserve the unique and vital virgin rainforest ecosystems while providing a fair, regular source of income to miners, their families and their communities. Also for work on jewellery, a special mention was made of Ian Doyle, from Lifeworth Consulting, for his research on a new agenda for responsible jewellery, focusing on social development. A spanish version of his report “Uplifting the Earth” was launched at the awards.

Dana Thomas presenting at the awards

In a talk before the awards, author of the best-selling “Deluxe”, Dana Thomas, explained that the “luxury industry” is an oxymoron, as luxury is about something rare and special, and with a living heritage embodied in its productions processes today. In his talk, Professor Jem Bendell explained that the history of most industries is the history of creative destruction of incumbent companies and brands, so that we should expect to see new luxury brands emerge because of the disruptive potential of the internet, sustainability challenges, and changing patterns of cultural exchange.

The award to Perma Hue was presented by Maria Eugenia Giron, former CEO of Carrera y Carrera, and author of “Inside Luxury”. Award winners received a leaf bowl of Palo Santo wood carved by the Wichi aboriginals of the Argentine North East. The awards were judged by Maria Eugenia Giron (IE Business School), Dana Thomas (best-selling author), Eduardo Escobedo (United Nations, UNCTAD), Summer Rayne Oakes (Source4style),

Awards Judge Maria Eugenia Giron with winners from Perma Hue

Renata Black (7 Bar Foundation), Ana Laura Torres (Centre for Sustainable Textiles) and Professor Jem Bendell (Lifeworth / Griffith University / Authentic Luxury Network).

The main Argentine newspaper covered the event and the winners. Awards organiser Miguel Angel Gardetti announced that the awards would stay in Argentina for one more year, but extend their reach in nominations and coverage. Further information on the winners, the speakers, the awards, and others working on sustainable luxury, is available at: http://www.authenticluxury.net

Professor Gardetti and Professor Bendell, founders of the awards

Nominations for the 2012 Sustainable Luxury Awards should be sent to www.lujosustentable.org

Constant financial crises and growing protests over economic policies now punctuate the headlines. Personal crises, over debt or job insecurity, sadly punctuate our conversations with friends and family. Capitalism seems sick, or at least this version of it. So for those of us working on corporate social responsibility, social enterprise and responsible investment, how do we relate to these crises? If capitalism needs healing, are we acting as an anti-inflammatory, a placebo, or a potential cure?

Some in this space prefer to look away from the growing crises, and busy themselves with a growing market for CSR advisory and reporting in emerging markets or the increasing (yet relatively few) examples social enterprise and ’shared value’ partnerships. But others are thinking about how their work relates to the critical issue of transforming our economic and social systems to be more fair and sustainable, as we discussed in our last review “Capitalism in Question.”

Front cover of Ethical Corporation issue 1

Ten years ago, the very first issue of Ethical Corporation magazine showed a picture of anti-globalisation protesters in Genoa on its front cover. The caption read “would you like this to happen outside your HQ.” The argument was that companies needed to be more responsible to avoid attack. Yet the causes that anti-globalisation protesters were raising, and that the OccupyWallStreet and related protesters raise today, are key to the future success of business, and ability of business people to have decent working lives. Today, to point to social unrest as cause for more CSR in its current form would be completely missing the point. Because unless there are systemic changes to economic governance, the very basis of a stable economy is under threat. So today, the question should be “Can your company afford not to support the protests?” Just as some companies supported (or didn’t sanction) their employees to take time off to protest during the Arab Spring, so companies can do the same for protests calling for deep economic and political reforms in Western countries.

Over the past 16 years working in CSR I’ve sought to encourage and apply a “movement mentality”, being conscious of how we are working on something greater than building the reputation or business of an employer or client. We need to be clear that we are working as a social movement to transform all business and finance. So these times of instability require us to discuss with each other about how to have a far greater systemic effect that we currently have in our silos. They require us to look deeper our own sectors and how they contribute to systemic problems, and could contribute to systemic solutions. For instance, can people in responsible investment continue to consider the realm of high frequency trades and derivatives to be beyond their concern? Why accept impotence if you entered finance to have a greater impact?

Having difficult conversations with colleagues is essential if we are to see deeper change that matches the challenges of economic governance today. Having unusual conversations with those outside our normal professional community is also now critical – listening to critics who are engaged in OccupyWallStreet and other campaigns is key. Learning together in this way, we may discover a more systemic agenda for our work, and begin healing capitalism. For your employees to learn in this way, they will need to get out of the office, and onto the streets. That’s why your company needs to OccupyWallStreet.

My own journey in CSR has led me to an understanding of systemic flaws, some of which are described in my book “The Corporate Responsibility Movement”. One systemic flaw I overlooked for too long is our monetary system. Beneath the financial and environmental crises lies a hidden crisis in the way our money is created. The way private banks create about 97% of our money as debt, out of nothing, and charge interest on it. That monetary policy choice is a cancer at the heart of our economies, meaning that our real economy, and our real wealth found in our environment and communities, is chewed up to service compound interest on perpetual debt. I explained in my TEDx talk in Rome last month that the solutions involve both monetary reform and scaling complementary currencies. Although many of the protesters’ initial demands are fairly mainstream reforms of banking and political process, discussions about the underlying causes of the current crises are happening and new initiatives around monetary reform are springing up.

Initially it may seem difficult to see how companies can usefully engage in these issues. But I believe they can. All forms of business can begin to accept complementary currencies as payment, and offer to pay their employees partly in a complementary currency. Mobile phone companies can help scale complementary currencies through collaborating on sms payment systems. Retail banks can open accounts in complementary currencies. All firms can integrate complementary currencies into their philanthropy and community engagement. Firms can switch their accounts to banks who practice full reserve banking, such as the JAK members bank. Firms can encourage local governments to issue their own mutual credit systems, and for all governments to tax transactions in complementary currencies in such currencies, not national money. Firms can also back campaigns for ending fractional reserve banking, such as Positive Money, in the UK.

Although much can be done, it would be naive to think that all firms and banks can find a win-win approach to monetary reform and monetary alternatives. Some banks will lose out if the right changes are implemented. Their commercial interests are our common enemy. Individuals in such banks could consider to donate their wages to groups campaigning for real change or creating real currency alternatives, like Community Forge. They could also leak documents to help future prosecutions, or expose the attitudes and approaches in their banks. And they could apply for jobs at banks that practice full reserve banking or provide innovative peer-to-peer lending. Movements need people on the inside and outside, but key is that we make sure we are having an impact, not just making excuses.

Responsible companies should back protests for fundamental economic reform, like OccupyWallStreet. They should do this both for commercial reasons, given the economic damage caused by the current financial system. But they should also do it as an expression of the shared concerns of their stakeholders, including their staff and owners.

It is time to cut out the cancerous monetary system. Otherwise we have no chance of healing capitalism, for a fairer and more sustainable way of life.

–

l’ll expand on these themes in my next book “Healing Capitalism” (Bendell and Doyle, 2012 forthcoming Greenleaf Publishing). For now, to learn more, you can read the introduction to Capitalism in Question, and see the TEDx talk on money. I am currently researching how large organisations, including companies, can more effectively engage with complementary currencies. I’d welcome any information on this topic.

8th October 2011, www.twitter.com/jembendell